Tower Insurance v. M.B.G. Inc.

288 A.D.2d 69, 733 N.Y.S.2d 20, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10931
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 69 (Tower Insurance v. M.B.G. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tower Insurance v. M.B.G. Inc., 288 A.D.2d 69, 733 N.Y.S.2d 20, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about September 1, 2000, which, in an action by the insurer of a building owner in subrogation against the occupants of a store in the building that was the source of a fire, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff claims that an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants’ negligence caused the fire. It is argued that such issue is raised by evidence that the fire started in a back room of the store under defendants’ exclusive control, that the individual defendant, the store’s owner and manager, admittedly smoked a pack of cigarettes a day in the back room, and that the Suffolk County Police Department, which investigated the accident, reported that while the cause of the fire could not be determined, “it could have been caused by an errant lit cigarette left on the shelf in the back room.” However, such evidence is insufficient to raise the issue of fact claimed. To infer that defendant caused the fire because he normally smoked in the area where the fire started is to indulge in unwarranted speculation (see, Matter of Burton v Broadcast Music, 31 AD2d 557, affd 24 NY2d 1016; Broder v MacNeil, 232 AD2d 163, 166, [70]*70lv denied 88 NY2d 816). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Akeed, Inc. v. Barcomb
2025 NY Slip Op 07151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Slonecki v. Damm
122 A.D.3d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
NEW YORK MUTUAL UNDERWRITERS v. KING, THOMAS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
New York Mutual Underwriters v. King
85 A.D.3d 1645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
One Beacon Insurance v. CMB Contracting Corp.
84 A.D.3d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Cataract Metal Finishing, Inc. v. City of Niagara Falls
31 A.D.3d 1129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Public Service Mutual Insurance v. 99¢ Plus of Fifth Avenue, Inc.
5 A.D.3d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Travelers Property Casualty v. Gomez Supermarket
195 Misc. 2d 876 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Easy Shopping Corp. v. Sneakers Center & Sports, Inc.
303 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 69, 733 N.Y.S.2d 20, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tower-insurance-v-mbg-inc-nyappdiv-2001.