Public Service Mutual Insurance v. 99¢ Plus of Fifth Avenue, Inc.

5 A.D.3d 276, 774 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3247
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered August 21, 2003, which, in this property damage subrogation action, granted the motion of defendant 5510 5th [277]*277Avenue Discount Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact with respect to the cause of the fire. Its expert’s report and affidavit to the effect that an employee of defendant 99¢ Plus had caused the fire while smoking in the stairwell 10 minutes before the fire started were based upon pure speculation (see Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v M.B.G. Inc., 288 AD2d 69 [2001]).

We have considered plaintiffs other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Service Mutual Insurance v. 99¢ Plus of Fifth Avenue, Inc., 5 A.D.3d 276, 774 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 276 (Public Service Mutual Insurance v. 99¢ Plus of Fifth Avenue, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NEW YORK MUTUAL UNDERWRITERS v. KING, THOMAS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
New York Mutual Underwriters v. King
85 A.D.3d 1645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)