Touchton v. Stewart

190 S.E.2d 912, 229 Ga. 303, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 589
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 28, 1972
Docket27236
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 190 S.E.2d 912 (Touchton v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Touchton v. Stewart, 190 S.E.2d 912, 229 Ga. 303, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 589 (Ga. 1972).

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

The controlling question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint of the appellant without notice that the case was on the trial calendar as required by Code Ann. § 81A-140 (c) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 653; 1967, pp. 226, 245).

The trial court’s order states: "The within case having been placed on the calendar for the February term 1972 of the Superior Court of Echols County and same having been called for trial on February 7th, 1972, and at the regular February term 1972 of said court and no one having answered for either party and no continuance having been requested, said action, including all cross actions are hereby dismissed with prejudice.” The appeal is from this judgment. Held:

The appellant argues in his brief that it was error for this case to be placed on the trial court calendar without notice to him under the provision of Code Ann. § 81A-140 (c). The record does not show whether notice was given to the appellant. The appellee in his brief states that he received notice that the case was on thé calendar for February 7, 1972.

There is a presumption in favor of the regularity and legality of all proceedings in the superior court. Code §38-114; Johnson v. State, 27 Ga. App. 679, 681 (109 SE 526). See Bible v. Marra, 226 Ga. 154, 159 (173 SE2d 346).

Since this presumption of law cannot be rebutted by a direct appeal in this case involving an issue of fact which *304 has not been judicially determined by the trial court, the contention of the appellant is without merit. See in this connection Wilkes v. Ricks, 126 Ga. App. 266.

Argued June 12, 1972 Decided June 28, 1972. A. W. Touchton, for appellant. J. Laddie Boatright, Frank E. Blankenship, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nash v. State
503 S.E.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Scott v. Morris Brown College
297 S.E.2d 45 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Lakeshore Marine, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
296 S.E.2d 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Hancock v. Oates
259 S.E.2d 437 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
State v. McDonald
249 S.E.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Nalley v. State
249 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Key v. State
250 S.E.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Cox v. Estes
249 S.E.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
State v. McDonald
245 S.E.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Wilson v. State
243 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Bennett v. Adel Banking Co.
241 S.E.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Moody v. Mendenhall
234 S.E.2d 905 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Vaughan v. Car Tapes, Inc.
217 S.E.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Johnson v. Cleveland
206 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Easterling v. Easterling
204 S.E.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Newman v. Greer
205 S.E.2d 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.E.2d 912, 229 Ga. 303, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/touchton-v-stewart-ga-1972.