Torres v. State
568 So. 2d 1340, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8373, 1990 WL 166811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Torres v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 517 So. 2d 796 →
Opinion
We have considered all five issues which the appellant has raised but find merit in only one, that costs and fees were imposed without sufficient notice to him nor opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we affirm his convictions and sentences but vacate the order imposing costs and fees. We remand without prejudice to the appellee to seek reassessment of costs and fees after proper notice and hearing. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torres v. State, 568 So. 2d 1340, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8373, 1990 WL 166811 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
568 So. 2d 1340 (Torres v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. State
544 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)