Torres v. State
589 So. 2d 447, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 1991 WL 240058
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1991·No. No. 90-1676·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The witness’ comment at trial, concerning a spot in a tape recorded conversation between appellant and his codefendant, to the effect that appellant was not going to talk until he spoke to a lawyer, may well have been a comment on his right to remain silent. Nevertheless, considering the strong evidence of guilt, such error in this case was harmless applying the standard in State v. Diguilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torres v. State, 589 So. 2d 447, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11449, 1991 WL 240058 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
589 So. 2d 447 (Torres v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kiner v. State
824 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)