Torres v. 1420 Realty

111 A.D.3d 434, 974 N.Y.S.2d 405
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered July 20, 2012, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff sustained injuries when she fell after the paint bucket she was using as a step stool tilted over, allegedly due to the uneven condition of the floor of her apartment in defendants’ building. Plaintiff’s independent and superseding act of using the paint bucket as a step stool, which was placed on an uneven floor, was not foreseeable, thereby breaking the chain of causation (see Montgomery v Federal Express Corp., 4 NY3d 805 [2005]; Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308, 315 [1980]; compare Gonzalez v Handwerger, 180 AD2d 411 [1st Dept 1992]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torres v. 1420 Realty, 111 A.D.3d 434, 974 N.Y.S.2d 405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

111 A.D.3d 434 (Torres v. 1420 Realty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, LLC
124 A.D.3d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)