Newman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, LLC

124 A.D.3d 551, 998 N.Y.S.2d 633
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 2015·No. 14072 155632/12·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered February 18, 2014, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

It is undisputed that plaintiff George Newman was injured when he followed a coworker in climbing down from a loading platform by stepping onto piled up milk crates, which were on the ground, although defendants provided a wall-mounted ladder for use in exiting the platform. Plaintiffs choice to use the crates rather than the ladder was the sole cause of his injuries *552 (see Torres v 1420 Realty, L.L.C., 111 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Montgomery v Federal Express Corp., 4 NY3d 805 [2005]). Whether the ladder was visible behind the trucks that were parked in the area is irrelevant, since plaintiff testified that he did not look for another means of accessing the parking level.

Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Andrias, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, LLC, 124 A.D.3d 551, 998 N.Y.S.2d 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

124 A.D.3d 551 (Newman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
828 N.E.2d 592 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
Torres v. 1420 Realty
111 A.D.3d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)