Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.
915 N.E.2d 664, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1441
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is dismissed due to relator’s failure to respond to the order issued by this court on October 9, 2009 to show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action without payment of the filing fee and security deposit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth., 915 N.E.2d 664, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1441 (Ohio 2009).
915 N.E.2d 664 (Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.