Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.

Ohio Supreme Court

Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.

914 N.E.2d 1057, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1415

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 2009·No. 2009-1810·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon review of relator’s proffered affidavit of indigency, submitted to waive the filing fee and security deposit,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within ten days of the date of this order relator either submits the $40 filing fee and $100 security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV or show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action, or any future actions, without payment of the filing fee and security deposit

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon review of relator’s proffered affidavit of indigency, submitted to waive the filing fee and security deposit,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within ten days of the date of this order relator either submits the $40 filing fee and $100 security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV or show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action, or any future actions, without payment of the filing fee and security deposit

Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth., 914 N.E.2d 1057, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

914 N.E.2d 1057 (Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.