Toro v. My Perfect Pet, Inc.
This text of Toro v. My Perfect Pet, Inc. (Toro v. My Perfect Pet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K ----------------------------------------------------------X : JASMINE TORO, on behalf of herself and all : others similarly situated, : : Plaintiff, : 23-CV-6019 (VSB) : -against- : ORDER : MY PERFECT PET, INC., : : Defendant. : : --------------------------------------------------------- X VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On July 13, 2023, Plaintiff Jasmine Toro (“Plaintiff) filed this action against Defendant My Perfect Pet, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff obtained a summons on July 14, 2023. (Doc. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an affidavit of service or taken any other action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that, no later than November 1, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit a letter of no more than three (3) pages, supported by legal authority, demonstrating good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). “Good cause is generally found only in exceptional circumstances where the plaintiff’s failure to serve process in a timely manner was the result of circumstances beyond its control.” E. Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 503, 505 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). “District courts consider the diligence of plaintiff’s efforts to effect proper service and any prejudice suffered by the defendant as a consequence of the delay.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). “An attorney’s inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause.” Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, 977 F.Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (citing McGregor v. United States, 933 F.2d 156, 160 (2d Cir.1991), aff’d, 173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir.1999)). Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a letter and to demonstrate good cause for failure to serve Defendant within ninety days after the complaint was filed will result in dismissal of this action. SO ORDERED. f on. Dated: October 18, 2023 if □□□ □□□ ld pas f 8 an New York, New York XL TAO ATOM Leg VERNON S. BRODERICK United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Toro v. My Perfect Pet, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toro-v-my-perfect-pet-inc-nysd-2023.