Toram v. Howard Beneficial Ass'n

4 Pa. 519, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 276
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 22, 1846·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case, neither an action nor a mandamus would lie. The corporation is bound by the fundamental articles, to pay only when it is in funds; and it has determined that it is not. As the plaintiff', in becoming a corporator, assented to its acts prospectively to be done, according to the charter of its constitution, he is concluded by the decision of his own forum. We are to believe that the proper authorities passed judicially on his claim, and we are not to re-judge their judgment. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toram v. Howard Beneficial Ass'n, 4 Pa. 519, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 276 (Pa. 1846).

4 Pa. 519 (Toram v. Howard Beneficial Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of America
161 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Beeman v. Supreme Lodge
29 Pa. Super. 387 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Commonwealth v. Union League
19 A. 1030 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1890)