Toomey's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Toomey's Estate

24 A. 697, 150 Pa. 535, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1366

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 13, 1892·No. Appeal, No. 90·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We think the learned auditor and court below were right in rejecting the appellant’s claim. It was exceedingly stale, if not suspicious. It was long since barred by the statute of limitations. The letter from John Toomey to the appellant, dated April 18, 1886, and which he relies upon to toll the statute, is found by the auditor to be a forgery. We cannot sustain any of the specifications of error.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We think the learned auditor and court below were right in rejecting the appellant’s claim. It was exceedingly stale, if not suspicious. It was long since barred by the statute of limitations. The letter from John Toomey to the appellant, dated April 18, 1886, and which he relies upon to toll the statute, is found by the auditor to be a forgery. We cannot sustain any of the specifications of error.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Toomey's Estate, 24 A. 697, 150 Pa. 535, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1366 (Pa. 1892).

Pincite

24 A. 697 (Toomey's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related