Tooley's Executors v. Jasper's Administrators
3 N.C. 383
Opinion
said, itsemed to him the answer should have stated the sums advanced ; that the court might judge from thence whether the considetation were adiqnate or unconscionable; and he refused to dissolve the injunction. The authorities cited for the complainant, were 2 C. Digest, Chancery 4. D. 3, 4 D. 4, 4 D. 5, 4 D. 7, 4 D. 10. 4 edition, page 665, 666, 668, 669.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tooley's Executors v. Jasper's Administrators, 3 N.C. 383 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).
3 N.C. 383 (Tooley's Executors v. Jasper's Administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of New York v. State of Connecticut Et Al.
4 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1799)
Turner v. Enrille
4 U.S. 7 (Supreme Court, 1799)