Tonningsen v. Commissioner
This text of 22 B.T.A. 738 (Tonningsen v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[739]*739OPINION.
We have held that a commission paid to real estate brokers for procuring a lease is not an ordinary and necessary business expense deductible from gross income for the year in which paid, as contended by petitioners, but that such a commission constitutes a capital expenditure, deductible ratably over the term of the lease, although the taxpayer is on the cash receipts and disbursements basis. Spinks Realty Co., 21 B. T. A. 674; Mary C. Young et al., 20 B. T. A. 692; S. M. Clawson, 19 B. T. A. 1253; and the authorities cited therein. Those decisions are controlling in the instant case and accordingly the respondent’s action of allowing as a deduction [740]*740for 1924 a sum representing one ninety-ninth of the said commission paid, is approved.
The fact that the petitioners are elderly and have a comparatively short life expectancy and that the lease gives the lessee an option to purchase the property at some future date which at present is not determinable, does not in our opinion take the instant case out of the rule laid down in the above cited cases, as contended by petitioners, for such facts do not change the character of the expenditure so far as the taxable year 1924 is concerned.
Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 B.T.A. 738, 1931 BTA LEXIS 2073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tonningsen-v-commissioner-bta-1931.