Tonner v. First Service Residential Corporation
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK panne KX STEPHEN D. TONNER, Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 6913 (KMW) JUDGMENT FIRSTSERVICE CORPORATION; FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL ONTARIO; NAWALEEN; MARIA DIMAKAS; RICHARD A. ELIA; ANTONI CASALINUOVO; ELIA ASSOCIATES; SHANTI E. BARCLAY; DEO CONDOMINIUM LAWYERS; PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; GENERAL OF ONTARIO; LAW SOCIETY OF ONTARIO, Defendants. panne KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 2, 2025, the Court has dismissed the complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies under 28 § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is entered dismissing this action. Dated: New York, New York July 8, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court
BY: dK MANGO ‘Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tonner v. First Service Residential Corporation (Tonner v. First Service Residential Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.