Toni Antonio Lopez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 2025
DocketA26A0442
StatusPublished

This text of Toni Antonio Lopez v. State (Toni Antonio Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toni Antonio Lopez v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 12, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A0442. TONI ANTONIO LOPEZ v. THE STATE.

Following a jury trial, Toni Antonio Lopez was convicted of armed robbery, burglary and six counts of false imprisonment. After the trial court denied his motion for new trial, Lopez appealed, contending that the evidence was insufficient and that his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance. See Lopez v. State, 332 Ga. App. 763 (774 SE2d 802) (2015), disapproved in part by McClure v. State, 306 Ga. 856, 864 (1) n. 17 (834 SE2d 96) (2019). We affirmed the judgment. See id. In July 2025, Lopez filed a pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal, which the trial court dismissed. Lopez now appeals from the dismissal order, contending, among other things, that he was entitled to pursue an out-of-time appeal pursuant to recently enacted OCGA § 5-6-39.1. We lack jurisdiction. “The denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal is directly appealable when the criminal conviction at issue has not undergone appellate review.” Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190, 191 (563 SE2d 856) (2002). But Lopez’s conviction already underwent review by this Court and was affirmed on direct appeal. See Lopez, 332 Ga. App. at 766. The affirmance of the judgment of conviction in Lopez’s previous appeal constitutes binding law of the case. Perez v. State, 263 Ga. App. 411, 412 (588 SE2d 269) (2003). Lopez “is not entitled to another bite at the apple by way of a second appeal.” Jackson v. State, 273 Ga. 320, 320 (540 SE2d 612) (2001). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/12/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richards v. State
563 S.E.2d 856 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Jackson v. State
540 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)
Lopez v. the State
774 S.E.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Perez v. State
588 S.E.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
McClure v. State
306 Ga. 856 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Toni Antonio Lopez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toni-antonio-lopez-v-state-gactapp-2025.