Jackson v. State

540 S.E.2d 612, 273 Ga. 320
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 8, 2001
DocketS00A1691
StatusPublished
Cited by138 cases

This text of 540 S.E.2d 612 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. State, 540 S.E.2d 612, 273 Ga. 320 (Ga. 2001).

Opinion

Thompson, Justice.

Allen Dean Jackson was convicted of murder and armed robbery in connection with the death and armed robbery of Bruce Wayne Skinner. Jackson moved for a new trial. The tried court denied the motion, and Jackson filed a timely notice of appeal. The appeal was docketed in this Court on August 11, 1995, and submitted for decision on briefs. The judgment was affirmed unanimously on February 5, 1996. Jackson v. State, 266 Ga. 308 (467 SE2d 495) (1996). Jackson’s motion for reconsideration was denied on March 6, 1996.

Four years later, on March 5, 2000, Jackson, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, asserting that, to his knowledge, an appeal had not been taken. The trial court denied the motion and Jackson appeals, asserting the trial court erred in denying the motion for an out-of-time appeal summarily, i.e., without affording him an opportunity to present evidence.

We affirm. Jackson does not allege that he has new evidence to present. He simply asserts that he wants to pursue an out-of-time appeal because he did not appeal previously. It is clear, however, that Jackson did appeal, and his contentions were given due consideration. He is not entitled to another bite at the apple by way of a second appeal. See generally South Ga. Medical Center v. Washington, 269 Ga. 366, 367 (1) (497 SE2d 793) (1998) (an appellate ruling in a case is binding in all subsequent proceedings); Llewellyn v. State, 252 Ga. 426 (2) (314 SE2d 227) (1984) (litigation must come to an end).

Although we now affirm the judgment of the trial court, henceforth, appeals of this nature will be dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronnie L. Lawton v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Larry Clark v. L.C. Halsten, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
JAMES HIGGS v. LATISHA DEAR JACKSON
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Dewaymon A. Harris v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Dexter Lee Williams v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
YOLANDA BELL v. NICOLE GARY
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Andron Miguel Francis v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Danny Ray Dunn v. Caryn Alissa Dunn
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Ptav, Inc. v. Ralph + Rita Venture, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Shekita Maxwell v. Bowman Station Nrde, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Dmante Dontrell Anderson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
THASHA BOYD v. DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Arthur Bussey v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Robert Eugene Simmons v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023
Charles Carmichael v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023
Ben Westbrook v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023
Ben D. Westbrook v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023
Eric T. Russell, Sr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 S.E.2d 612, 273 Ga. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-ga-2001.