Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Toney v. City of Atlanta

Toney v. City of Atlanta

64 S.E. 1106, 6 Ga. App. 356, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 294
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1909
Docket1871
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 1106 (Toney v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toney v. City of Atlanta, 64 S.E. 1106, 6 Ga. App. 356, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 294 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Por the most part this ease is controlled, by Oallanowy v. Allanta, ante.

2. A clerk who in a municipality sells intoxicating liquor kept by his employer in his place of business may be convicted of violating the municipal ordinance forbidding the keeping of liquor on hand for the purposes of illegal sale. By analogy to the rule in misdemeanor eases, all who participate either directly or aceessorially in the violation of a municipal ordinance may be held as principals. Hendrix v. State, 5 Ga. App. 819 (63 S. E. 939). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McBrearty v. Mayor of Macon
85 S.E. 608 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Morse v. Mayor of Macon
72 S.E. 284 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Harbuck v. City of Atlanta
67 S.E. 108 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Stradley v. City of Atlanta
67 S.E. 107 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.E. 1106, 6 Ga. App. 356, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toney-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1909.