Harbuck v. City of Atlanta
This text of 67 S.E. 108 (Harbuck v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In the main, the case is governed'by the decision this d'ay rendered in Whitley v. Atlanta, supra (67 S. E. 108).
2. “By analogy to the rule in misdemeanor eases, all who participate either directly or aceessorially in the violation of a municipal ordinance may be held as principals.” Toney v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 356 (64 S. E. 1106).
3. The evidence, though weak and circumstantial, is not, legally speaking, insufficient to support the conviction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E. 108, 7 Ga. App. 441, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harbuck-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1910.