Harbuck v. City of Atlanta
67 S.E. 108, 7 Ga. App. 441, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 336
Opinion
1. In the main, the case is governed'by the decision this d'ay rendered in Whitley v. Atlanta, supra (67 S. E. 108).
2. “By analogy to the rule in misdemeanor eases, all who participate either directly or aceessorially in the violation of a municipal ordinance may be held as principals.” Toney v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 356 (64 S. E. 1106).
3. The evidence, though weak and circumstantial, is not, legally speaking, insufficient to support the conviction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harbuck v. City of Atlanta, 67 S.E. 108, 7 Ga. App. 441, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 336 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
67 S.E. 108 (Harbuck v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morse v. Mayor of Macon
72 S.E. 284 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)