Tommy Yowell v. Granite Operating Company And Granite Operating Company and Apache Corporation v. Peyton Royalties, L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 26, 2018
Docket07-17-00112-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Tommy Yowell v. Granite Operating Company And Granite Operating Company and Apache Corporation v. Peyton Royalties, L.P. (Tommy Yowell v. Granite Operating Company And Granite Operating Company and Apache Corporation v. Peyton Royalties, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tommy Yowell v. Granite Operating Company And Granite Operating Company and Apache Corporation v. Peyton Royalties, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-17-00112-CV

TOMMY YOWELL; GAIL YOWELL; HARRY GRAFF; EL TERCIO, LLC; AND CASUARINA INVESTMENTS, LLC (D/B/A LAR RESOURCES, LLC), APPELLANTS

V.

GRANITE OPERATING COMPANY AND APACHE CORPORATION, AND PAC PRODUCTION CO.; MESA OIL & GAS CORP.; AND CATTALO, LTD., APPELLEES

AND

GRANITE OPERATING COMPANY AND APACHE CORPORATION, APPELLANTS

PEYTON ROYALTIES, L.P.; BAILEY PEYTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE GEORGE BAILEY PEYTON, IV 2007 GRANTOR RETAINED ANNUITY TRUST NO. 1; AND PEYTON HOLDINGS CORP., APPELLEES

On Appeal from the 31st District Court Wheeler County, Texas Trial Court No. 12,944, Honorable Steven R. Emmert, Presiding

July 26, 2018

DISSENTING OPINION Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. It is with the utmost respect that I dissent from the opinion of my learned

colleagues. One can read thousands of opinions regarding complex oil and gas litigation

and never encounter the terms “anti-washout,” “rule against perpetuities,” and “doctrine

of cy pres” in the same opinion. It is the uniqueness of those rarely cited principles that

has caused me to examine so closely the appropriateness of the trial court’s summary

disposition of this dispute. Because the majority affirms the decision of the trial court to

dispose of this dispute, as a matter of law, based upon the rule against perpetuities and

then dismisses consideration of the doctrine of cy pres—I respectfully dissent.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tommy Yowell v. Granite Operating Company And Granite Operating Company and Apache Corporation v. Peyton Royalties, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tommy-yowell-v-granite-operating-company-and-granite-operating-company-and-texapp-2018.