Tomlinson v. Harver
208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 135
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 12, 1953·No. 11768_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The caveators appeal from a judgment for the caveatees, based upon a directed verdict, in a suit to set aside a will on grounds of fraud, undue influence, and lack of testamentary capacity. It does not appear that the jury, if it had been permitted to choose, could reasonably have returned a different verdict. The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tomlinson v. Harver, 208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 135 (D.C. Cir. 1953).
208 F.2d 46 (Tomlinson v. Harver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. Benjamin Simmons, Caveatee v. Elsie M. Pinney, Caveators
375 F.2d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)