Tomlinson v. Harver
208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1953
Docket11768_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 208 F.2d 46 (Tomlinson v. Harver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tomlinson v. Harver, 208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 135 (D.C. Cir. 1953).
Opinion
The caveators appeal from a judgment for the caveatees, based upon a directed verdict, in a suit to set aside a will on grounds of fraud, undue influence, and lack of testamentary capacity. It does not appear that the jury, if it had been permitted to choose, could reasonably have returned a different verdict. The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
J. Benjamin Simmons, Caveatee v. Elsie M. Pinney, Caveators
375 F.2d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tomlinson-v-harver-cadc-1953.