Clement v. United States

208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 154, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3019
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 20, 1953·No. 11673·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.C.Code (1951) § 22-1502, 52 Stat. 198 (1938), penalized possession of slips “used, or to be used” for carrying on a lottery. Appellant’s possession of used numbers slips, known in the game as “dead” slips, was therefore an offense, although it occurred before Public Law 85, § 206, 83d Cong., 1st Sess., June 29, 1953, which adds the words “current or not current,” was enacted. France v. United States, 164 U.S. 676, 17 S.Ct. 219, 41 L.Ed. 595, and United States v. Halseth, 342 U.S. 277, 72 S.Ct. 275, 96 L.Ed. 308, on which appellant relies, dealt with statutes that did not contain the word “used” or any equivalent word.

Appellant’s possession of used slips was also “prima-facie evidence” of carrying on a lottery. D.C.Code (1951) § 22-1501, 31 Stat. 1330 (1901) as amended. Harvey v. United States, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 36, 197 F.2d 594; Shaw v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. -, 209 F.2d 298.

We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clement v. United States, 208 F.2d 46, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 154, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3019 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

208 F.2d 46 (Clement v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lewis
171 F. Supp. 71 (District of Columbia, 1959)
Ferguson v. United States
123 A.2d 615 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1956)
Ledbetter v. United States
211 F.2d 628 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
Tomlinson v. Harver
208 F.2d 46 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)