Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland
45 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 855, 4 How. 16, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 379
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question arising on this record is, whether, by the laws of Alabama, a contract made in that State by the agents of a corporation created by the law of another State is valid. This point was fully considered and decided in the case of the Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 519, and cannot now be considered as open for argument in this court. The principles decided in that case must govern this ; and the judgment of the District Court is therefore reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland, 45 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 855, 4 How. 16, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 379 (1845).
45 U.S. 16 (Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chemical Nat. Bank v. Armstrong
76 F. 339 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1896)
Rockwell v. Carpenter
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 529 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
In re Christern
56 How. Pr. 5 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1878)
Franklin Co. v. Lewiston Institution for Savings
68 Me. 43 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1877)
Huntington v. Allen
44 Miss. 654 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)
Merrick v. . Van Santvoord
34 N.Y. 208 (New York Court of Appeals, 1866)