Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland

45 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 855, 4 How. 16, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 379
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 18, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 45 U.S. 16 (Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland, 45 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 855, 4 How. 16, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 379 (1845).

Opinion

Mr. Chief-Justice TANEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question arising on this record is, whether, by the laws of Alabama, a contract made in that State by the agents of a corporation created by the law of another State is valid. This point was fully considered and decided in the case of the Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 519, and cannot now be considered as open for argument in this court. The principles decided in that case must govern this ; and the judgment of the District Court is therefore reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chemical Nat. Bank v. Armstrong
76 F. 339 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1896)
Rockwell v. Carpenter
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 529 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
In re Christern
56 How. Pr. 5 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1878)
Franklin Co. v. Lewiston Institution for Savings
68 Me. 43 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1877)
Huntington v. Allen
44 Miss. 654 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)
Merrick v. . Van Santvoord
34 N.Y. 208 (New York Court of Appeals, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 U.S. 16, 11 L. Ed. 855, 4 How. 16, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tombigbee-railroad-v-kneeland-scotus-1845.