Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wood

512 N.E.2d 671, 32 Ohio St. 3d 166, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 366
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 26, 1987
DocketD.D. No. 86-30
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 512 N.E.2d 671 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wood, 512 N.E.2d 671, 32 Ohio St. 3d 166, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 366 (Ohio 1987).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent has been served with notice of the complaint and order to show cause. Pursuant to Gov. Bar R. VI, every attorney admitted to the practice of law in Ohio is required to file biennially a Certificate of Registration, and “to keep the Clerk of this Court apprised of his or her current residence address and office address, and notify the Clerk of any changes.” Gov. Bar R. VI(6). Respondent has not complied with these requirements and therefore has no basis for complaint if he failed to receive any notice issued by this court. See Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Bradley (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 123, 10 O.O. 3d 310, 383 N.E. 2d 122.

Upon a full review of this matter, we find that the respondent’s abrupt and unexplained termination of his law practice without making any provision for the legal matters entrusted to him, thereby failing to protect his clients’ interests, and his failure to respond to relator’s attempts to contact him in furtherance of its investigation, is conduct that adversely reflects upon his [169]*169fitness to practice law in violation of DR 1-102(A)(6). Respondent’s failure to acknowledge any of relator’s letters and his failure to answer the complaint or appear at the hearing of this matter is sufficient proof of his disregard for his professional status. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Talbott (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 76, 13 O.O. 3d 64, 391 N.E. 2d 1028.

Accordingly, we adopt the recommendations of the board and hereby order that respondent, Roger Allen Wood, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. It is further ordered that the cost of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
720 N.E.2d 525 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
1999 Ohio 74 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wallace
1998 Ohio 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 N.E.2d 671, 32 Ohio St. 3d 166, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-wood-ohio-1987.