Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

Ohio Supreme Court

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

383 N.E.2d 122, 56 Ohio St. 2d 123

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 1978

DocketD. D. No. 78-2

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 383 N.E.2d 122 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Bradley, 383 N.E.2d 122, 56 Ohio St. 2d 123 (Ohio 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent has been served notice of the order to show cause. Pursuant to Gov. R. VII, every attorney admitted to the practice of law in this state is required to file with the clerk of this court a Certificate of Registration. The sending of the notice of the order to show cause by registered mail to respondent’s and his co-counsel’s address as registered with this court constituted effective service. Moreover, respondent additionally has been served notice of this order to show cause by publication.

Upon an examination of the record, we conclude there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. The recommendation of the board is accepted, and the respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Leach, C. J., HeRbeut, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent has been served notice of the order to show cause. Pursuant to Gov. R. VII, every attorney admitted to the practice of law in this state is required to file with the clerk of this court a Certificate of Registration. The sending of the notice of the order to show cause by registered mail to respondent’s and his co-counsel’s address as registered with this court constituted effective service. Moreover, respondent additionally has been served notice of this order to show cause by publication.

Upon an examination of the record, we conclude there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. The recommendation of the board is accepted, and the respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Leach, C. J., HeRbeut, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 N.E.2d 122, 56 Ohio St. 2d 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-state-bar-assn-v-bradley-ohio-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack