Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer

520 N.E.2d 223, 35 Ohio St. 3d 261, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 61
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1988
DocketD.D. No. 87-13
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 520 N.E.2d 223 (Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer, 520 N.E.2d 223, 35 Ohio St. 3d 261, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 61 (Ohio 1988).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. While we adopt the findings of the board, we reject the sanction recommended. Respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for one year, that year being suspended on the condition that respondent satisfactorily complete a two-year probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Lochee, Holmes, [264]*264Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Berk
873 N.E.2d 285 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Dzienny
1995 Ohio 307 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer
567 N.E.2d 1016 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 N.E.2d 223, 35 Ohio St. 3d 261, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toledo-bar-assn-v-westmeyer-ohio-1988.