Todisman v. Todisman
336 S.W.3d 485, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 2011 WL 794829
Opinion
ORDER
Patricia Ann Todisman appeals the judgment dissolving her marriage to James Dean Todisman. We find the trial court’s judgment was not erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Todisman v. Todisman, 336 S.W.3d 485, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 2011 WL 794829 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
336 S.W.3d 485 (Todisman v. Todisman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tiger Paw, L.L.C. v. Show-Me's of Columbia, Inc.
336 S.W.3d 485 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)