Tiger Paw, L.L.C. v. Show-Me's of Columbia, Inc.

336 S.W.3d 485, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, 2011 WL 864976
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. WD 72384·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*486 Order

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Cote and Show-Me’s of Columbia, Inc., appeal the judgment entered after a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Boone County in favor of James and Esther Koop and Tiger Paw, L.L.C., finding Cote and Show-Me’s of Columbia, Inc., jointly and severally liable for obligations arising under a breach of an Asset Purchase Agreement between Show-Me’s of Columbia, Inc., and Tiger Paw, L.L.C. Appellants raise two points on appeal. They argue that the trial court erred in finding that (1) Show-Me’s of Columbia, Inc., breached the Asset Purchase Agreement and (2) that Cote was individually liable for any damages caused by such breach of the Asset Purchase Agreement. We affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling today. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tiger Paw, L.L.C. v. Show-Me's of Columbia, Inc., 336 S.W.3d 485, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, 2011 WL 864976 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

336 S.W.3d 485 (Tiger Paw, L.L.C. v. Show-Me's of Columbia, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todisman v. Todisman
336 S.W.3d 485 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)