Todd v. Wood
This text of 80 Ind. 429 (Todd v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal in this case because the assignment of errors does not •contain the full names of all the parties, as required by rule ■one of this court.
There seem to be more than twenty appellants and two appellees in the case. In the assignment of errors they are designated as follows, to wit: “ Daniel Todd et al. v. Daniel Wood et al.w
The case was not submitted by agreement, but upon default of the appellees, who, therefore, have not waived their right to insist on the rule. The motion must be sustained. Lang v. Cox, 35 Ind. 470; Darnall v. Hurt, 55 Ind. 275.
The appeal is dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 Ind. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-wood-ind-1881.