Darnall v. Hurt

55 Ind. 275
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Niblack, J.

It is provided by rule No. 1 of this court, that “ The assignment of error shall contain the full names of the parties.” The appellants in this case have not complied with that rule. The names of William Emmert and Gilbert H. Goodwin, two of the defendants in the court below, and on whose motion the appeal to this court was granted, and in whose especial interests it seems to be prosecuted here, do not appear at all in the assignment of error, on the record in this cause. Eor that reason, the appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, and the motion will have to be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darnall v. Hurt, 55 Ind. 275 (Ind. 1876).

55 Ind. 275 (Darnall v. Hurt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hodgin
39 N.E. 161 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Thoma v. State
86 Ind. 182 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Todd v. Wood
80 Ind. 429 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)