Darnall v. Hurt
This text of 55 Ind. 275 (Darnall v. Hurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is provided by rule No. 1 of this court, that “ The assignment of error shall contain the full names of the parties.” The appellants in this case have not complied with that rule. The names of William Emmert and Gilbert H. Goodwin, two of the defendants in the court below, and on whose motion the appeal to this court was granted, and in whose especial interests it seems to be prosecuted here, do not appear at all in the assignment of error, on the record in this cause. Eor that reason, the appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, and the motion will have to be sustained.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Ind. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnall-v-hurt-ind-1876.