Todd v. Silverman

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 28, 2022·No. 7:20-cv-03608·Unknown

Opinion

WEE SN □ Deed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | PRONICALLY □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WEAK Be KEITH TODD, ie eee i PLED: es 28 □□□□□ Plaintiff, -against- 20 CIVIL 3608 (NSR) JUDGMENT LEROY FIELDS, ADAM W. SILVERMAN, ANNE MARIE MCGRATH, TINA STANFORD, and ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Defendants. penne nnn eee eee eee XK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated February 25, 2022, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and pro se Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety without leave to replead. The Court also certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court AMANO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. Silverman, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Todd v. Silverman (Todd v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)