Todd v. Saldaña

33 P.R. 656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Todd v. Saldaña. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 P.R. Dec. 704
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided August 2, 1924·No. No. 223·Published

Opinions

ORDER.

Whereas, In answer to the petition filed in this proceeding the Executive Secretary alleged that there were two candidates of the same party for the same office and stated that he wonld follow the conrse prescribed by section 36 of the Electoral Law;

Whereas, The petitioner questioned the applicability of. that law, and

Whereas, Within the time available for considering the question the Court is not prepared, under the facts and the jurisprudence placed before it, to hold positively that the said law is not applicable;

Thereeore, The writ is discharged and the petition is denied, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to bring further proceedings before the courts as he may be advised.

Petition denied.

Mr. Justice Aldrey concurred in the result. Mr. Justice Franco Soto dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. Saldaña, 33 P.R. 656 (prsupreme 1924).

33 P.R. 656 (Todd v. Saldaña) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Eaton v. District Court
18 Colo. 26 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1892)
Phelps v. Piper
33 L.R.A. 53 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
State ex rel. Rose v. Piper
69 N.W. 384 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Dupuis v. Interior Construction & Improvement Co.
50 N.W. 103 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Shields v. Jacob
13 L.R.A. 760 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Stephenson v. Boards of Election Commissioners
42 L.R.A. 214 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)