Todd v. Adams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Todd v. Adams

208 S.E.2d 237, 23 N.C. App. 104, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2022

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 18, 1974

Docket7418SC634

StatusPublished

This text of 208 S.E.2d 237 (Todd v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todd v. Adams, 208 S.E.2d 237, 23 N.C. App. 104, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2022 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The only question requiring discussion on this appeal is whether the release executed by Mattie Woody Todd prior to her appointment as administratrix of her husband’s estate is a bar to an action for the wrongful death of her husband instituted subsequent to her appointment as administratrix of his estate.

The amount recovered in an action for wrongful death is not liable to be applied as assets of the estate, in the payment of debts or legacies, except as to burial expenses of the deceased, and reasonable hospital and medical expenses not exceeding $500.00, but shall be disposed of as provided in the Intestate Succession Act. G.S. 28-173. The right of action for wrongful death is purely statutory, and it may be brought only “by the executor, administrator or collector of the decedent. ...” G.S. 28-173; Graves v. Welborn, 260 N.C. 688, 133 S.E. 2d 761 (1963) ; Reid v. Smith, 5 N.C. App. 646, 169 S.E. 2d 14 (1969). A widow, as such, has no right of action for the death of her husband. Graves v. Welborn, supra; Howell v. Comrs., 121 N.C. 362, 28 S.E. 362 (1897). Therefore, being unable to maintain a claim for wrongful death, the wife cannot execute a release for such a claim that would be binding on the estate unless she is first appointed the personal representative of the estate.

The judgment appealed from is

Reversed.

Judges Britt and Baley concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Judge.

The only question requiring discussion on this appeal is whether the release executed by Mattie Woody Todd prior to her appointment as administratrix of her husband’s estate is a bar to an action for the wrongful death of her husband instituted subsequent to her appointment as administratrix of his estate.

The amount recovered in an action for wrongful death is not liable to be applied as assets of the estate, in the payment of debts or legacies, except as to burial expenses of the deceased, and reasonable hospital and medical expenses not exceeding $500.00, but shall be disposed of as provided in the Intestate Succession Act. G.S. 28-173. The right of action for wrongful death is purely statutory, and it may be brought only “by the executor, administrator or collector of the decedent. ...” G.S. 28-173; Graves v. Welborn, 260 N.C. 688, 133 S.E. 2d 761 (1963) ; Reid v. Smith, 5 N.C. App. 646, 169 S.E. 2d 14 (1969). A widow, as such, has no right of action for the death of her husband. Graves v. Welborn, supra; Howell v. Comrs., 121 N.C. 362, 28 S.E. 362 (1897). Therefore, being unable to maintain a claim for wrongful death, the wife cannot execute a release for such a claim that would be binding on the estate unless she is first appointed the personal representative of the estate.

The judgment appealed from is

Reversed.

Judges Britt and Baley concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 S.E.2d 237, 23 N.C. App. 104, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-adams-ncctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack