Howell v. Board of Commissioners

28 S.E. 362, 121 N.C. 362
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 28 S.E. 362 (Howell v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. Board of Commissioners, 28 S.E. 362, 121 N.C. 362 (N.C. 1897).

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

Plaintiff alleges that she is the widow of Z. B. Howell, deceased, who, she alleges, died by reason of defendants’ negligence in allowing the County jail to be and remain in an unhealthy condition during her husband’s confinement therein. Plaintiff does not sue as the executrix, administratrix or collector of her husband, but sues in her own right, as the widow of deceased, and defendants demur on that ground. At common law the injured party alone could maintain an action for damages, and in case of death from the injury, the right of action did not survive to any one. By Statute (Code, 1498) the personal representative of the deceased is allowed to prosecute an action for damages at any time within one year from the death. The demurrer should have been sustained. Code 1498; Best v. Kinston, 106 N. C., 205.

We are not informed as to the truth of the allegations, nor is it necessary that we should be in order to dispose of this case; but, if they are true, the conditions would probably be improved by invoking the aid of the criminal side of the docket.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Todd v. Adams
208 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
First Union National Bank v. Hackney
145 S.E.2d 352 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF CAROLINA v. Hackney
145 S.E.2d 352 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Graves v. Welborn
133 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Journigan v. Little River Ice Co.
63 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Brown v. Southern Railway Co.
162 S.E. 613 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Hanes v. . Utilities Co.
131 S.E. 402 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Hanes v. Southern Public Utilities Co.
191 N.C. 13 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Hood v. American Telegraph & Telephone Co.
77 S.E. 1096 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Bennett v. North Carolina Railroad
74 S.E. 883 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Killian v. Southern Railway Co.
38 S.E. 873 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.E. 362, 121 N.C. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-board-of-commissioners-nc-1897.