Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 5, 2014·No. 05-13-00634-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 5, 2014

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00634-CV

TODD PRUETT, Appellant

V.

MICHAEL PITTMAN, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07463

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s Motion to Add New Evidence. This is a pro se appeal

from the trial court’s order dated January 22, 2013, dismissing appellant’s claims with prejudice

for failure to file an expert report. Appellant’s motion seeks to add to the record of this appeal a

letter dated September 4, 2013, and filed in the Dallas County clerk’s office on September 13,

2013. Because the letter was filed over seven months after the trial court signed the order

dismissing appellant’s claims, the letter was not before the trial court when the court dismissed

appellant’s claims. As a result, we may not consider the letter in our review of the trial court’s

ruling dismissing appellant’s claims. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans (Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.