Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans
This text of Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans (Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered February 5, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00634-CV
TODD PRUETT, Appellant
V.
MICHAEL PITTMAN, M.D., Appellee
On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07463
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s Motion to Add New Evidence. This is a pro se appeal
from the trial court’s order dated January 22, 2013, dismissing appellant’s claims with prejudice
for failure to file an expert report. Appellant’s motion seeks to add to the record of this appeal a
letter dated September 4, 2013, and filed in the Dallas County clerk’s office on September 13,
2013. Because the letter was filed over seven months after the trial court signed the order
dismissing appellant’s claims, the letter was not before the trial court when the court dismissed
appellant’s claims. As a result, we may not consider the letter in our review of the trial court’s
ruling dismissing appellant’s claims. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Todd Pruett v. Michael Pittmans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-pruett-v-michael-pittmans-texapp-2014.