Tobalina v. California

Supreme Court

Tobalina v. California

419 U.S. 926, 95 S. Ct. 201, 42 L. Ed. 2d 159, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 3008

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 21, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1764

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 419 U.S. 926 (Tobalina v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tobalina v. California, 419 U.S. 926, 95 S. Ct. 201, 42 L. Ed. 2d 159, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 3008 (1974).

Pincite

Opinions

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (Douglas, J., dissenting) ; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (Douglas, J., dissenting) ; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 U.S. 926, 95 S. Ct. 201, 42 L. Ed. 2d 159, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 3008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobalina-v-california-scotus-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack