Tivas v. Tivas

194 So. 796, 142 Fla. 207, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1351
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tivas v. Tivas. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Fla. 385
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 8, 1940·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Ti-iomas are of opinion that the decree in this cause should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Chapman are of opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and *208 adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tivas v. Tivas, 194 So. 796, 142 Fla. 207, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1351 (Fla. 1940).

194 So. 796 (Tivas v. Tivas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)