Tivas v. Tivas
This text of 191 So. 774 (Tivas v. Tivas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to review an interlocutory order entered by the Chancellor in a chancery cause was presented and granted. The effect of the writ is to bring up the record as it appears in the court below to review the order, or orders, complained of and nothing more. After the writ is granted and shall have been served, the cause proceeds in this Court just as such matters have heretofore proceeded on appeal. No additional pleadings are contemplated here and the issues and parties remain the same as they were when the order complained of was entered in the court below. This does not preclude *386 filing of motion to quash the writ if there be cause for such motion.
In this case motion to quash has been filed. The motion is denied.
There have been filed here also what has been termed Answer to Petition and certain affidavits not appearing in the record in the court below.
■ Motion and proof of' notice of hearing thereon to strike the so-called answer, and affidavits are before us and on consideration thereof the motion is granted.
Briefs on the merits will be filed under the rules relating to cases reviewed on appeal.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 So. 774, 140 Fla. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tivas-v-tivas-fla-1939.