Tippins v. Spears

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tippins v. Spears

89 S.E.2d 210, 92 Ga. App. 495, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 619

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 12, 1955

Docket35773

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 210 (Tippins v. Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tippins v. Spears, 89 S.E.2d 210, 92 Ga. App. 495, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Townsend, J.

Upon the call of this case there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and .it being- plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the judgment therein affirmed, and penalty of ten percent for delay be awarded him is granted. Code § 6-1801; Code § 24-3634; James v. Sullivan, 24 Ga. App. 297 (100 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed, with penalty.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townsend, J.

Upon the call of this case there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and .it being- plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the judgment therein affirmed, and penalty of ten percent for delay be awarded him is granted. Code § 6-1801; Code § 24-3634; James v. Sullivan, 24 Ga. App. 297 (100 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed, with penalty.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 210, 92 Ga. App. 495, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tippins-v-spears-gactapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack