Tippins v. Spears

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tippins v. Spears

89 S.E.2d 210, 92 Ga. App. 495, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 619

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 12, 1955·No. 35773·Published

Opinion

Townsend, J.

Upon the call of this case there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and .it being- plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the judgment therein affirmed, and penalty of ten percent for delay be awarded him is granted. Code § 6-1801; Code § 24-3634; James v. Sullivan, 24 Ga. App. 297 (100 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed, with penalty.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townsend, J.

Upon the call of this case there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and .it being- plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the judgment therein affirmed, and penalty of ten percent for delay be awarded him is granted. Code § 6-1801; Code § 24-3634; James v. Sullivan, 24 Ga. App. 297 (100 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed, with penalty.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Tippins v. Spears, 89 S.E.2d 210, 92 Ga. App. 495, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

89 S.E.2d 210 (Tippins v. Spears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related