James v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

James v. Sullivan

100 S.E. 654, 24 Ga. App. 297, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 583

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 20, 1919

Docket10417

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 654 (James v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Sullivan, 100 S.E. 654, 24 Ga. App. 297, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 583 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Upon the call of this ease there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and it being plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the [298]*298judgment therein affirmed, and damages of ten per "Cent, for delay be awarded him, is granted. (Civil Code, § 6249).

Decided October 20, 1919.

Motion for new trial; from Douglas superior court—Judge Bartlett. December 27, 1918.

J. B. Hutcheson, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI