Tippecanoe Township v. Manlove

39 Ind. 249
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 Ind. 249 (Tippecanoe Township v. Manlove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tippecanoe Township v. Manlove, 39 Ind. 249 (Ind. 1872).

Opinion

Pettit, J.

The appellant sued the appellee, to collect,an assessment on a premium note given for three policies issued by the Farmers and Merchants’ Insurance Company. A demurrer, for want of sufficient facts, was overruled to the complaint.

This case presents the same questions as Embree v. Shideler, 36 Ind. 423, and a number of similar cases decided since, but which are not reported; and a majority of the court hold that this must meet the same fate.

C. R. Pollard, B. B. Daily, and D. B. Graham, for appellant. J. R. Troxell and W. R. Manlove, for appellee.

The judgment is reversed, at the costs of the appellee, with instructions to the court below to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. Brown
46 N.E. 908 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
Downs v. Hammond
47 Ind. 131 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Ind. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tippecanoe-township-v-manlove-ind-1872.