Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLC

731 N.W.2d 494, 266 Mich. App. 801
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 5, 2005
DocketDocket Nos. 243171, 244609
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 731 N.W.2d 494 (Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLC, 731 N.W.2d 494, 266 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

The Court orders that the plaintiffs-appellants’ motion for reconsideration is granted. The Court’s opinion issued in these consolidated cases on February 22,2005, is hereby vacated inasmuch as this Court did not have jurisdiction to issue that opinion.

The Court furthers orders that this Court’s opinion issued on June 24, 2004, in these consolidated cases is reissued and reinstated as of the date of the Clerk’s certification of this order, and is the opinion of the Court.

The Court further orders that this Court’s opinion issued on June 24, 2004, in Tingley v Kortz, 262 Mich App 583 (2004), is unaffected by any order that has been entered in the consolidated cases referenced here.

WILDER, J., concurs in the result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLC
733 N.W.2d 440 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2007)
Tingley v. WARDROP II
731 N.W.2d 494 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
731 N.W.2d 494, 266 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tingley-v-900-monroe-llc-michctapp-2005.