Tinajero v. State

172 Tex. Crim. 129
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tinajero v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 820
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 21, 1962·No. No. 34,314·Published

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of failure to stop and render aid.

[130]*130In view of our disposition of the cause, the facts need not be set forth.

An examination of the record reflects the absence of a judgment, as required by Art. 766, V.A.C.C.P.; a notice of appeal, Gentry v. State, 273 S.W. 2d 419, Anderson v. State, 165 Texas Cr. Rep. 643, 310 S.W. 2d 83 and neither a recognizance nor an appeal bond, Alexander v. State, 272 S.W. 2d 100, Griffin v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 478, 272 S.W. 2d 526.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tinajero v. State, 172 Tex. Crim. 129 (Tex. 1962).

172 Tex. Crim. 129 (Tinajero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. State
272 S.W.2d 100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Griffin v. State
272 S.W.2d 526 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Griffin v. State
160 Tex. Crim. 478 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Anderson v. State
310 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Gentry v. State
273 S.W.2d 419 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)