Tinajero v. State
This text of 172 Tex. Crim. 129 (Tinajero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for the offense of failure to stop and render aid.
[130]*130In view of our disposition of the cause, the facts need not be set forth.
An examination of the record reflects the absence of a judgment, as required by Art. 766, V.A.C.C.P.; a notice of appeal, Gentry v. State, 273 S.W. 2d 419, Anderson v. State, 165 Texas Cr. Rep. 643, 310 S.W. 2d 83 and neither a recognizance nor an appeal bond, Alexander v. State, 272 S.W. 2d 100, Griffin v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 478, 272 S.W. 2d 526.
For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 Tex. Crim. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinajero-v-state-texcrimapp-1962.