Tinajero v. State

172 Tex. Crim. 129
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 21, 1962
DocketNo. 34,314
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Tex. Crim. 129 (Tinajero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tinajero v. State, 172 Tex. Crim. 129 (Tex. 1962).

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of failure to stop and render aid.

[130]*130In view of our disposition of the cause, the facts need not be set forth.

An examination of the record reflects the absence of a judgment, as required by Art. 766, V.A.C.C.P.; a notice of appeal, Gentry v. State, 273 S.W. 2d 419, Anderson v. State, 165 Texas Cr. Rep. 643, 310 S.W. 2d 83 and neither a recognizance nor an appeal bond, Alexander v. State, 272 S.W. 2d 100, Griffin v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 478, 272 S.W. 2d 526.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. State
272 S.W.2d 100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Griffin v. State
272 S.W.2d 526 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Griffin v. State
160 Tex. Crim. 478 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Anderson v. State
310 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Gentry v. State
273 S.W.2d 419 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Tex. Crim. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tinajero-v-state-texcrimapp-1962.