Timucuan Properties, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Timucuan Properties, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon

135 So. 3d 524, 2014 WL 1325741, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5014

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 2014·No. No. 5D13-2020·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla. 1927) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene.”); see also Peninsular Naval Stores Co. v. Cox, 49 So. 191, 194 (Fla.1909); SADCO, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat’l Bank, 419 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla. 1927) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene.”); see also Peninsular Naval Stores Co. v. Cox, 49 So. 191, 194 (Fla.1909); SADCO, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat’l Bank, 419 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Timucuan Properties, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon, 135 So. 3d 524, 2014 WL 1325741, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5014 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

135 So. 3d 524 (Timucuan Properties, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related