Sadco, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc.
680 So. 2d 1072, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10365, 1996 WL 557655
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1996·No. No. 95-3622·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
SADCO, Inc. appeals from an order denying its motion to intervene in a residential foreclosure action. Notwithstanding appellant’s arguments to the contrary, the trial court correctly denied its motion to intervene under the controlling authority of Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat’l Bank, 419 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (purchaser of property that was subject of lis pendens arising from bank’s pending foreclosure action not entitled to intervene in that action).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sadco, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So. 2d 1072, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10365, 1996 WL 557655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
680 So. 2d 1072 (Sadco, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Space Coast Credit Union v. Goldman
262 So. 3d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Tikhomirov v. Bank of New York Mellon
223 So. 3d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Bonafide Properties v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
198 So. 3d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Bymel v. Bank of America, N.A.
159 So. 3d 345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Timucuan Properties, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon
135 So. 3d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Green v. State
680 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)