Timothy C. Adamson v. Bradford E. Meehan

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 15, 2018·No. A18A1200·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 28, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1200. TIMOTHY C. ADAMSON v. BRADFORD E. MEEHAN.

Timothy Adamson filed this direct appeal from a trial court order denying his OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) motion to set aside a 2005 judgment. We lack jurisdiction. “[T]he denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 is not directly appealable and instead requires the filing of an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b).” Jim Ellis Atlanta v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006); see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Adamson’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/28/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy C. Adamson v. Bradford E. Meehan, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Timothy C. Adamson v. Bradford E. Meehan (Timothy C. Adamson v. Bradford E. Meehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson
640 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)