Timothy Alexander v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 30, 2013·No. 05-12-01345-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered April 30, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01345-CR

TIMOTHY ALEXANDER, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-34377-N

ORDER The Court DENIES appellant’s April 25, 2013 motion to dismiss counsel and proceed

pro se. See Martinez v. Court of Appeals of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152 (2000).

The Court DENIES appellant’s April 25, 2013 pro se motion amended motion to

supplement the record. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered April 30, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01345-CR

TIMOTHY ALEXANDER, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-34377-N

ORDER The Court DENIES appellant’s April 25, 2013 motion to dismiss counsel and proceed

pro se. See Martinez v. Court of Appeals of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152 (2000).

The Court DENIES appellant’s April 25, 2013 pro se motion amended motion to

supplement the record. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Timothy Alexander v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Timothy Alexander v. State (Timothy Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

528 U.S. 152 (Supreme Court, 2000)

616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)