Timothy Alexander v. State
Opinion
Order entered July 1, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01345-CR
TIMOTHY ALEXANDER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-34377-N
ORDER The Court DENIES appellant’s June 26, 2013 second motion to dismiss counsel and
proceed pro se. See Martinez v. Court of Appeals of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152
(2000).
We DENY appellant’s June 20, 2013 “motion to accept, file & consider appellant’s (late
emergency) brief”; “motion to extend time for filing of appellant’s brief”; and “motion for
appointment of new attorney on appeal/motion to proceed en forma pauperis.” See Buntion v.
Harmon, 827 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim.
App. [Panel Op.] 1981); Sampson v. State, 854 S.W.2d 659 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1992, no pet.).
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy Alexander v. State (Timothy Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.